<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris O&#8217;Leary&#8217;s Worthless Argument against the Inverted W</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/</link>
	<description>Strength training, Personal training, Warbird Academy, DBSP, Bloomington IL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S.</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Dan - I&#039;m an engineer and pitching enthusiast.  Your critique of Chris O&#039;s method is right on.  I was also annoyed at the logic, even though I tend to agree with the conclusions (strictly by random chance). Good work.  For my part, I went and dug into the physics and can show a very convincing argument (mathematically) that the inverted W casues much higher stresses at critical joints and &quot;in theory&quot; we might be able to draw a line to higher injury risk based on this, but my little study by no means is conclusive on injury or durability.  I would also have to invest many hours in research to find any useful empirical correlation to which I could tune my model.  Since my analysis relies on multi-bar linkage dynamics, I would also have to measure the arms of my sample pitchers which seems a show-stopper. In conclusion, I think there is something here and getting to the bottom of it could be useful. I remain curious..
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; I&#8217;m an engineer and pitching enthusiast.  Your critique of Chris O&#8217;s method is right on.  I was also annoyed at the logic, even though I tend to agree with the conclusions (strictly by random chance). Good work.  For my part, I went and dug into the physics and can show a very convincing argument (mathematically) that the inverted W casues much higher stresses at critical joints and &#8220;in theory&#8221; we might be able to draw a line to higher injury risk based on this, but my little study by no means is conclusive on injury or durability.  I would also have to invest many hours in research to find any useful empirical correlation to which I could tune my model.  Since my analysis relies on multi-bar linkage dynamics, I would also have to measure the arms of my sample pitchers which seems a show-stopper. In conclusion, I think there is something here and getting to the bottom of it could be useful. I remain curious..<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan G.</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-529</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re stating opinion as fact.  If you were to research the issue a little further, you would be led to the work of Paul Nyman, a guy who O&#039;Leary demonizes, but who did more fruitful baseball research than O&#039;leary will ever dream of doing.  Nyman actually coined the term &quot;inverted W&quot; as a way to describe an arm action where there were the hands break with the elbows and there is no clear break in momentum.  Some of his early models for this were Nolan Ryan, John Smoltz, Bob Feller, and Pedro Martinez.  Others who threw or throw this way include Randy Johnson, Tom Glavine, Bob Gibson, Tom Seaver, and Tim Lincecum.  Nyman NEVER suggested that the &quot;inverted W&quot; as he saw it consisted of bringing the elbows above the level of the shoulder, nor has he ever tried to predict injuries.  As far as lifting the elbows above the shoulder goes, upward rotation of the scapula can allow this to happen without causing the supraspinatus tendon of the rotator cuff to be impinged, and there really is no good evidence that doing so makes pitching injuries more or less likely.  In fact, one of the all time ironmen of pitching, Mickey Lolich, lifted his throwing elbow significantly higher than his shoulder in his motion, and he pitched injury free in the major leagues for 16 years, carrying an extremely heavy workload.  I&#039;m not saying I know for sure one way or another, but I do know that O&#039;Leary has unfairly done a lot of damage to Paul Nyman&#039;s reputation, and has used the misfortunes of pitchers like Mark Prior and Stephen Strasburg to try and boost his own reputation.  I don&#039;t think that&#039;s fair or respectable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re stating opinion as fact.  If you were to research the issue a little further, you would be led to the work of Paul Nyman, a guy who O&#8217;Leary demonizes, but who did more fruitful baseball research than O&#8217;leary will ever dream of doing.  Nyman actually coined the term &#8220;inverted W&#8221; as a way to describe an arm action where there were the hands break with the elbows and there is no clear break in momentum.  Some of his early models for this were Nolan Ryan, John Smoltz, Bob Feller, and Pedro Martinez.  Others who threw or throw this way include Randy Johnson, Tom Glavine, Bob Gibson, Tom Seaver, and Tim Lincecum.  Nyman NEVER suggested that the &#8220;inverted W&#8221; as he saw it consisted of bringing the elbows above the level of the shoulder, nor has he ever tried to predict injuries.  As far as lifting the elbows above the shoulder goes, upward rotation of the scapula can allow this to happen without causing the supraspinatus tendon of the rotator cuff to be impinged, and there really is no good evidence that doing so makes pitching injuries more or less likely.  In fact, one of the all time ironmen of pitching, Mickey Lolich, lifted his throwing elbow significantly higher than his shoulder in his motion, and he pitched injury free in the major leagues for 16 years, carrying an extremely heavy workload.  I&#8217;m not saying I know for sure one way or another, but I do know that O&#8217;Leary has unfairly done a lot of damage to Paul Nyman&#8217;s reputation, and has used the misfortunes of pitchers like Mark Prior and Stephen Strasburg to try and boost his own reputation.  I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s fair or respectable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blewett</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-310</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting to hear. I just know that to find a true correlation, a random sample needs to be taken, not just a sample from the injured list. There are 400+ pitchers on big league rosters right now, most of whom are not injured. 

I don&#039;t try to mold my students into a &quot;w&quot; or &quot;inverted w&quot;. Arm action is something that is largely unique to each pitcher, and it&#039;s hard to alter it in a way that doesn&#039;t throw off a pitcher&#039;s total delivery and ability to be effective. I do, however, prefer for students to remove the ball from their gloves facing third base, as this orientation will help prevent the arm from wrapping too far down and behind the body, which causes inconsistent arm slot upon landing. I know O&#039;Leary preaches this as a way to promote a &quot;w&quot;, and it&#039;s something I think has value, even if it doesn&#039;t convert someone completely away from the &quot;inverted w.&quot; 

I personally take the ball out facing third and my wrist vertical, but then let my body do what it wants to do. I&#039;ve found that to be the most effective delivery for myself, irregardless of the category that puts me in.

Thanks for the thoughtful comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting to hear. I just know that to find a true correlation, a random sample needs to be taken, not just a sample from the injured list. There are 400+ pitchers on big league rosters right now, most of whom are not injured. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t try to mold my students into a &#8220;w&#8221; or &#8220;inverted w&#8221;. Arm action is something that is largely unique to each pitcher, and it&#8217;s hard to alter it in a way that doesn&#8217;t throw off a pitcher&#8217;s total delivery and ability to be effective. I do, however, prefer for students to remove the ball from their gloves facing third base, as this orientation will help prevent the arm from wrapping too far down and behind the body, which causes inconsistent arm slot upon landing. I know O&#8217;Leary preaches this as a way to promote a &#8220;w&#8221;, and it&#8217;s something I think has value, even if it doesn&#8217;t convert someone completely away from the &#8220;inverted w.&#8221; </p>
<p>I personally take the ball out facing third and my wrist vertical, but then let my body do what it wants to do. I&#8217;ve found that to be the most effective delivery for myself, irregardless of the category that puts me in.</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughtful comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Speaking as an unbiased bystander, I have gone through the majority of the Major League Baseball disabled list looking for pitchers with some sort of shoulder strain (disregarding the injuries that can be caused outside of pitching mechanics, i.e. abdominal strain, knee strains, etc.) and I have found that over 95% of said pitchers pitch the &quot;inverted W.&quot; Furthermore, the other 5% are borderline inverted W. Now, I understand that there are some pitchers with the inverted W that are NOT on the DL, but after my research, I believe it is safe to say the inverted W plays some sort of role when it comes to shoulder strain. It may not be the sole cause of injury, but coupled with other improper pitching mechanics, it may lead to the decline of a career. 

Also, I understand that you are a pithing coach. Knowing this information, do you teach your pupils to pitch with the inverted W? If so, you may be (I am not accusing you of anything) biased in your views. 

Anyway, I would just like to share the information I have come across with you. I hope this shines some new light on your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as an unbiased bystander, I have gone through the majority of the Major League Baseball disabled list looking for pitchers with some sort of shoulder strain (disregarding the injuries that can be caused outside of pitching mechanics, i.e. abdominal strain, knee strains, etc.) and I have found that over 95% of said pitchers pitch the &#8220;inverted W.&#8221; Furthermore, the other 5% are borderline inverted W. Now, I understand that there are some pitchers with the inverted W that are NOT on the DL, but after my research, I believe it is safe to say the inverted W plays some sort of role when it comes to shoulder strain. It may not be the sole cause of injury, but coupled with other improper pitching mechanics, it may lead to the decline of a career. </p>
<p>Also, I understand that you are a pithing coach. Knowing this information, do you teach your pupils to pitch with the inverted W? If so, you may be (I am not accusing you of anything) biased in your views. </p>
<p>Anyway, I would just like to share the information I have come across with you. I hope this shines some new light on your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Interesting. While many of the HOF&#039;ers are from the old days and thus video is not available, I did 1/2 hour of research and found video (or multiple still photos) of 25 HOFer&#039;s (nearly half) and of that list ONLY Don Drysdale had the inverted W.

Grover Cleveland - No
Jim Bunning - No
Steve Carlton - No
Jack Chesbro - No
John Clarkson - 
Dizzy dean - No
Don Drysdale - Yes
Dennis Eckersly - No
Bob Feller - No
Rollie Fingers - No
Whitey Ford - No
Bob Gibson - No
Catfish Hunter - No
Fergie Jenkins - No
Sandy Koufax - No
Bob Lemon - No
Jim Palmer - No
Gaylord Perry - No
Robin Roberts - No
Nolan Ryan - No
Tom Seaver - No
Warren Spahn - No
Don Sutton - No
Dazzy Vance - No
Rube Waddell - No</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. While many of the HOF&#8217;ers are from the old days and thus video is not available, I did 1/2 hour of research and found video (or multiple still photos) of 25 HOFer&#8217;s (nearly half) and of that list ONLY Don Drysdale had the inverted W.</p>
<p>Grover Cleveland &#8211; No<br />
Jim Bunning &#8211; No<br />
Steve Carlton &#8211; No<br />
Jack Chesbro &#8211; No<br />
John Clarkson &#8211;<br />
Dizzy dean &#8211; No<br />
Don Drysdale &#8211; Yes<br />
Dennis Eckersly &#8211; No<br />
Bob Feller &#8211; No<br />
Rollie Fingers &#8211; No<br />
Whitey Ford &#8211; No<br />
Bob Gibson &#8211; No<br />
Catfish Hunter &#8211; No<br />
Fergie Jenkins &#8211; No<br />
Sandy Koufax &#8211; No<br />
Bob Lemon &#8211; No<br />
Jim Palmer &#8211; No<br />
Gaylord Perry &#8211; No<br />
Robin Roberts &#8211; No<br />
Nolan Ryan &#8211; No<br />
Tom Seaver &#8211; No<br />
Warren Spahn &#8211; No<br />
Don Sutton &#8211; No<br />
Dazzy Vance &#8211; No<br />
Rube Waddell &#8211; No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blewett</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-23</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, he is, but the difference is that the claims he makes are too strong.  He says, &quot;it&#039;s what great pitchers do,&quot; when in reality it&#039;s just what a few great pitchers do.  He oversteps his bounds.  But yes, you are right in your other points, I just have problems with methodology and language, as he presents things in a very strong way, which causes more concern in ballplayers who might be reading, who might not be in need of any actual changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, he is, but the difference is that the claims he makes are too strong.  He says, &#8220;it&#8217;s what great pitchers do,&#8221; when in reality it&#8217;s just what a few great pitchers do.  He oversteps his bounds.  But yes, you are right in your other points, I just have problems with methodology and language, as he presents things in a very strong way, which causes more concern in ballplayers who might be reading, who might not be in need of any actual changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-22</guid>
		<description>You are correct in stating that &quot;nearly everything in human performance is based on educated guesses and past success&quot;.  Isn&#039;t O&#039;leary doing just that when he is looking at pitchers with past success and similarities along with other information that he has gathered to make an educated guess?  He is not performing a research experiment and it is no different than you (a pitching coach) giving advice to ball players.  What advice do you give players and do you have research articles to back up everything you teach them?  I doubt it.  The readers can take what they want from it to see if it works for them, or not.  Nothing works for everybody, but at least he is looking at ways to try and prevent injuries in young pitchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct in stating that &#8220;nearly everything in human performance is based on educated guesses and past success&#8221;.  Isn&#8217;t O&#8217;leary doing just that when he is looking at pitchers with past success and similarities along with other information that he has gathered to make an educated guess?  He is not performing a research experiment and it is no different than you (a pitching coach) giving advice to ball players.  What advice do you give players and do you have research articles to back up everything you teach them?  I doubt it.  The readers can take what they want from it to see if it works for them, or not.  Nothing works for everybody, but at least he is looking at ways to try and prevent injuries in young pitchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blewett</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-21</guid>
		<description>This is still neither here nor there, and I am really uninterested in arguing opinions and credentials.  If you think you&#039;re more qualified than me, congratulations, you&#039;re one of many out there I am sure.  Yet, there are tons of pitching coaches out there, myself included, who don&#039;t need a degree in physical therapy to make pitchers better, and some of the best I know have no medical credentials.  &quot;Expert&quot; is subjective, and going to med school and having a great understanding of the body still doesn&#039;t make one an expert on using it.  Millions play baseball and very few actually have a clue how to play it at even a moderate level.  Theory from the training room is great, but it&#039;s all too often not translated onto the field.  And again, even if raising your shoulder causes impingement, this isn&#039;t necessarily causing pitching injuries.  And again, if you really have research on this, send it my way, because I don&#039;t care to argue over thin air.

My article was extremely straightforward, and you&#039;re arguing to me way beyond the scope of it.  Honestly, if you read my post, there is nothing to argue - his language is absolutely too strong for his claims, his claims are based on improper research methodology, and he cites no research.  Logically, it&#039;s garbage, no doubt about it.  Like I said in my article, I don&#039;t claim to be an expert on the role of pitching mechanics on injuries, nor do I advocate for kids out there to change their mechanics based on my opinions.  Nearly everything in human performance is based on educated guesses and past success.  Nothing works for everybody, and I&#039;m not nearly arrogant enough to tell you what you should teach your kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is still neither here nor there, and I am really uninterested in arguing opinions and credentials.  If you think you&#8217;re more qualified than me, congratulations, you&#8217;re one of many out there I am sure.  Yet, there are tons of pitching coaches out there, myself included, who don&#8217;t need a degree in physical therapy to make pitchers better, and some of the best I know have no medical credentials.  &#8220;Expert&#8221; is subjective, and going to med school and having a great understanding of the body still doesn&#8217;t make one an expert on using it.  Millions play baseball and very few actually have a clue how to play it at even a moderate level.  Theory from the training room is great, but it&#8217;s all too often not translated onto the field.  And again, even if raising your shoulder causes impingement, this isn&#8217;t necessarily causing pitching injuries.  And again, if you really have research on this, send it my way, because I don&#8217;t care to argue over thin air.</p>
<p>My article was extremely straightforward, and you&#8217;re arguing to me way beyond the scope of it.  Honestly, if you read my post, there is nothing to argue &#8211; his language is absolutely too strong for his claims, his claims are based on improper research methodology, and he cites no research.  Logically, it&#8217;s garbage, no doubt about it.  Like I said in my article, I don&#8217;t claim to be an expert on the role of pitching mechanics on injuries, nor do I advocate for kids out there to change their mechanics based on my opinions.  Nearly everything in human performance is based on educated guesses and past success.  Nothing works for everybody, and I&#8217;m not nearly arrogant enough to tell you what you should teach your kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Of course more research needs to be done in showing a causal link between pitching mechanics and injury.  I am just pointing out that from a medical and physical therapy stand point that what Chris O&#039;leary states about the inverted &quot;W&quot; is NOT worthless.  It has already been proven through lots of research that shoulder impingement occurs when the elbow is elevated above the shoulder and more stress is placed on the rotator cuff if it is externally rotated in that position. Yes, stress is placed on the rotator cuff every time a ball is thrown, but wouldn&#039;t you want to minimize it by using better mechanics?

Ask any orthopedist or physical therapist if the inverted &quot;W&quot; position is impinging the rotator cuff and creating more of chance for an injury.  I have some background in biomechanics, I have looked at hundreds of slow motion pitching clips,  I played baseball, and I am a physical therapist so I probably am more qualified to discuss body mechanics or pitching mechanics than you.  You state that Greg Maddux has nice pitching mechanics and I agree with you, but how do YOU know that?  My point was that All those great pitchers that I mentioned use very similar pitching mechanics and that does translate into how much and when specific muscles are &quot;fired&quot; and timing.

Yes, major league pitchers all use their core muscles, but some make better use of these muscles.   Some also create a larger hip/shoulder separation so that they are relatively using more of these muscles than their arms.  Why do think Tim Lincecum can throw so hard for such a little guy?  It&#039;s not because he has stronger arms than anyone else, it is because he makes better use of his mechanics, flexibility, and larger muscle groups.

So when you say Chris O&#039;leary&#039;s argument is worthless, I will have to disagree with you.  We should at least make use of the research that we have, even if some of it is correlational right now.   Some of his information suggests to me that he has done his homework and checked out several professionals and biomechanical studies before have provided his advice.  He has been correct in many of his predictions on pitchers and I don&#039;t believe he has been proven wrong either.  I am using some of his information, along with what I already know to teach my own kids so that their chances of getting injured may be reduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course more research needs to be done in showing a causal link between pitching mechanics and injury.  I am just pointing out that from a medical and physical therapy stand point that what Chris O&#8217;leary states about the inverted &#8220;W&#8221; is NOT worthless.  It has already been proven through lots of research that shoulder impingement occurs when the elbow is elevated above the shoulder and more stress is placed on the rotator cuff if it is externally rotated in that position. Yes, stress is placed on the rotator cuff every time a ball is thrown, but wouldn&#8217;t you want to minimize it by using better mechanics?</p>
<p>Ask any orthopedist or physical therapist if the inverted &#8220;W&#8221; position is impinging the rotator cuff and creating more of chance for an injury.  I have some background in biomechanics, I have looked at hundreds of slow motion pitching clips,  I played baseball, and I am a physical therapist so I probably am more qualified to discuss body mechanics or pitching mechanics than you.  You state that Greg Maddux has nice pitching mechanics and I agree with you, but how do YOU know that?  My point was that All those great pitchers that I mentioned use very similar pitching mechanics and that does translate into how much and when specific muscles are &#8220;fired&#8221; and timing.</p>
<p>Yes, major league pitchers all use their core muscles, but some make better use of these muscles.   Some also create a larger hip/shoulder separation so that they are relatively using more of these muscles than their arms.  Why do think Tim Lincecum can throw so hard for such a little guy?  It&#8217;s not because he has stronger arms than anyone else, it is because he makes better use of his mechanics, flexibility, and larger muscle groups.</p>
<p>So when you say Chris O&#8217;leary&#8217;s argument is worthless, I will have to disagree with you.  We should at least make use of the research that we have, even if some of it is correlational right now.   Some of his information suggests to me that he has done his homework and checked out several professionals and biomechanical studies before have provided his advice.  He has been correct in many of his predictions on pitchers and I don&#8217;t believe he has been proven wrong either.  I am using some of his information, along with what I already know to teach my own kids so that their chances of getting injured may be reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blewett</title>
		<link>http://danblewett.com/2009/06/chris-olearys-worthless-argument-against-the-inverted-w/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblewett.com/?p=88#comment-19</guid>
		<description>First, understand that neither O&#039;leary or yourself have any actual research showing a causal link between ANY type of pitching mechanics and injury.  NO ONE in the baseball biomechanics field has a causal link between pitching mechanics and injury.  Correlational research is the best anyone has done, and they have been weak at best.

Second, you&#039;ve completely missed the point.  O&#039;Leary&#039;s comparative argument is fatally flawed.  Sure, Greg Maddux has nice pitching mechanics, but just because Greg had a great, injury-free career does NOT indicate that his mechanics play any causal role in his or anyone else&#039;s injury status. The fact of the matter is, if you want to say anything about the role pitching mechanics play in injury, then you need to take a very large sample of pitchers and compare them to themselves as well as the major league average for injuries, etc. etc. (I explained this all in my article, which it appears you largely skimmed).

Third, how do you know Nolan Ryan, Roger, Greg and Randy use their &quot;Core&quot; muscles more than other pitchers? Let me answer: you don&#039;t.  That&#039;s just anecdotal.  There is not a pitcher out there who throws 90+ who doesn&#039;t use his large muscles, rotate his hips before his shoulders, etc. etc.

Fourth, &quot;stress&quot; on the rotator cuff? Stress is pretty common on the rotator cuff, as every pitch causes it, no matter the mechanics.  Stress will be there no matter how you throw, and in large, large amounts.  That&#039;s just the nature of the motion.

Please, email or fax me all of this research that you are quoting, I would love to see it.  Chances are, it either doesn&#039;t exist or doesn&#039;t prove anything at all, much like the musings of Chris O&#039;Leary, which I very clearly explained are flawed and anecdotal.  The best research in the baseball injury field is on GIRD, which is one of the most widely agreed upon correlational precursors to injury, is still only CORRELATIONAL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, understand that neither O&#8217;leary or yourself have any actual research showing a causal link between ANY type of pitching mechanics and injury.  NO ONE in the baseball biomechanics field has a causal link between pitching mechanics and injury.  Correlational research is the best anyone has done, and they have been weak at best.</p>
<p>Second, you&#8217;ve completely missed the point.  O&#8217;Leary&#8217;s comparative argument is fatally flawed.  Sure, Greg Maddux has nice pitching mechanics, but just because Greg had a great, injury-free career does NOT indicate that his mechanics play any causal role in his or anyone else&#8217;s injury status. The fact of the matter is, if you want to say anything about the role pitching mechanics play in injury, then you need to take a very large sample of pitchers and compare them to themselves as well as the major league average for injuries, etc. etc. (I explained this all in my article, which it appears you largely skimmed).</p>
<p>Third, how do you know Nolan Ryan, Roger, Greg and Randy use their &#8220;Core&#8221; muscles more than other pitchers? Let me answer: you don&#8217;t.  That&#8217;s just anecdotal.  There is not a pitcher out there who throws 90+ who doesn&#8217;t use his large muscles, rotate his hips before his shoulders, etc. etc.</p>
<p>Fourth, &#8220;stress&#8221; on the rotator cuff? Stress is pretty common on the rotator cuff, as every pitch causes it, no matter the mechanics.  Stress will be there no matter how you throw, and in large, large amounts.  That&#8217;s just the nature of the motion.</p>
<p>Please, email or fax me all of this research that you are quoting, I would love to see it.  Chances are, it either doesn&#8217;t exist or doesn&#8217;t prove anything at all, much like the musings of Chris O&#8217;Leary, which I very clearly explained are flawed and anecdotal.  The best research in the baseball injury field is on GIRD, which is one of the most widely agreed upon correlational precursors to injury, is still only CORRELATIONAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

